Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 107(6): 589-596, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1642826

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Animal and observational human studies report that delivery of excessive tidal volume (VT) at birth is associated with lung and brain injury. Using a respiratory function monitor (RFM) to guide VT delivery might reduce injury and improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of an RFM in addition to clinical assessment versus clinical assessment alone during mask ventilation in the delivery room reduces in-hospital mortality and morbidity of infants <37 weeks' gestation. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFM in addition to clinical assessment versus clinical assessment alone during mask ventilation in the delivery room of infants born <37 weeks' gestation. DATA ANALYSIS: Risk of bias was assessed using Covidence Collaboration tool and pooled into a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was death prior to discharge. MAIN OUTCOME: Death before hospital discharge. RESULTS: Three RCTs enrolling 443 infants were combined in a meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed no difference in rates of death before discharge with an RFM versus no RFM, relative risk (RR) 95% (CI) 0.98 (0.64 to 1.48). The pooled analysis suggested a significant reduction for brain injury (a combination of intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leucomalacia) (RR 0.65 (0.48 to 0.89), p=0.006) and for intraventricular haemorrhage (RR 0.69 (0.50 to 0.96), p=0.03) in infants receiving positive pressure ventilation with an RFM versus no RFM. CONCLUSION: In infants <37 weeks, an RFM in addition to clinical assessment compared with clinical assessment during mask ventilation resulted in similar in-hospital mortality, significant reduction for any brain injury and intraventricular haemorrhage. Further trials are required to determine whether RFMs should be routinely available for neonatal resuscitation.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Ventilación con Presión Positiva Intermitente/métodos , Hemorragia
2.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 106(6): 627-634, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1503592

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with delivery room respiratory support in at-risk infants who are initially vigorous and received delayed cord clamping (DCC). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two perinatal centres in Melbourne, Australia. PATIENTS: At-risk infants born at ≥35+0 weeks gestation with a paediatric doctor in attendance who were initially vigorous and received DCC for >60 s. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivery room respiratory support defined as facemask positive pressure ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure and/or supplemental oxygen within 10 min of birth. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-eight infants born at a median (IQR) gestational age of 39+3 (38+2-40+2) weeks were included. Cord clamping occurred at a median (IQR) of 128 (123-145) s. Forty-four (15%) infants received respiratory support at a median of 214 (IQR 156-326) s after birth. Neonatal unit admission for respiratory distress occurred in 32% of infants receiving delivery room respiratory support vs 1% of infants who did not receive delivery room respiratory support (p<0.001). Risk factors independently associated with delivery room respiratory support were average heart rate (HR) at 90-120 s after birth (determined using three-lead ECG), mode of birth and time to establish regular cries. Decision tree analysis identified that infants at highest risk had an average HR of <165 beats per minute at 90-120 s after birth following caesarean section (risk of 39%). Infants with an average HR of ≥165 beats per minute at 90-120 s after birth were at low risk (5%). CONCLUSIONS: We present a clinical decision pathway for at-risk infants who may benefit from close observation following DCC. Our findings provide a novel perspective of HR beyond the traditional threshold of 100 beats per minute.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/normas , Parto Obstétrico , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Cordón Umbilical , Australia/epidemiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Constricción , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/efectos adversos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA